Sunday, February 11, 2007

business as usual...



from the new york times:

Congress Finds Ways to Avoid Lobbyist Limits

WASHINGTON, Feb. 10 — The 110th Congress opened with the passage of new rules intended to curb the influence of lobbyists by prohibiting them from treating lawmakers to meals, trips, stadium box seats or the discounted use of private jets.

But it did not take long for lawmakers to find ways to keep having lobbyist-financed fun.

In just the last two months, lawmakers invited lobbyists to help pay for a catalog of outings: lavish birthday parties in a lawmaker’s honor ($1,000 a lobbyist), martinis and margaritas at Washington restaurants (at least $1,000), a California wine-tasting tour (all donors welcome), hunting and fishing trips (typically $5,000), weekend golf tournaments ($2,500 and up), a Presidents’ Day weekend at Disney World ($5,000), parties in South Beach in Miami ($5,000), concerts by the Who or Bob Seger ($2,500 for two seats), and even Broadway shows like “Mary Poppins” and “The Drowsy Chaperone” (also $2,500 for two).

The lobbyists and their employers typically end up paying for the events, but within the new rules.

ireland vs france

should be a great match-up, with ireland playing at home.

france look very strong, but the irish are the favourites, i know i should pick france, but i'm not. i'm going with ireland.

happy birthday to:

our very good friend, saleem.

cheers mate :)

quality time with quality people - there is no substitute...

Saturday, February 10, 2007

Scotland vs Wales



i'm rooting for wales, but scotland will be looking to rebuild after england gave them a good thumping last weekend.

have to go with scotland, playing at murrayfield.

England v Italy (Sat)



from the bbc:

England aim to continue their revival under head coach Brian Ashton when they face Italy at Twickenham on Saturday.

Jonny Wilkinson inspired England to a 42-20 win over Scotland last week and he can become the highest points scorer in championship history against Italy.

There are two changes to the starting XV, Nick Easter and Iain Balshaw replacing Joe Worsley and Olly Morgan.

Italy coach Pierre Berbizier has made seven changes to his starting line-up following the 39-3 defeat by France.

England are in buoyant mood following the Calcutta Cup victory on Saturday which saw returning fly-half Wilkinson claim 27 points in a stunning display.

And Wilkinson's first score against Italy will take him past former Wales star Neil Jenkins as the most prolific points accumulator in Five or Six Nations Championship history.

Wilkinson is currently tied with Jenkins on 406 points.

The Newcastle fly-half will also, if he gets on the board, join a select group of players to have racked up 900 points in international rugby.

The Scotland match was Brian Ashton's first game in charge following Andy Robinson's sacking in November, which came after a run of eight defeats in nine Tests.

And although England claimed a comfortable win, Ashton wants an improvement from his side on Saturday.

"We have talked about the mentality of winning, and we have enough experience in this team now to know what it takes to win Test matches," he said.

"Italy will take us on in the scrum and in the lineout, they will box-kick and they will be very confrontational.

"The lineout could be a huge theatre because Italy did a lot of damage to France in that area. I do know it will be a battlefield between numbers eight down to number one, and whatever the weather throws at us, we will throw it right back. It is not a concern.

"Discipline is hugely important, and conceding 14 penalties last week was unacceptable.

"You are never 100% happy as a a coach. For example, we didn't get enough go-forward possession in the first 20 minutes last Saturday - there was too much of us going from side to side."

england should land this comfortably...

Bangladesh cabbie is toast of NYC



from the bbc:

A Bangladeshi immigrant taxi driver in New York is the toast of the Big Apple after returning a $500,000 lost bag of diamond rings to their rightful owner.

get this; turns out that the owner of the diamonds had a $10.70 fare, and she paid him $11.00. that's a 30 cent tip... (or 2.8%)! not even a measly dollar!

i'd she got very lucky, wouldn't you?

how much do you reckon this same woman tips her hair stylist...?

Thursday, February 08, 2007

wanna see the hubble space telescope pass overhead ?



the hubble space telescope passes at an elevation high enough to be seen in the d.c. metro area this evening. not once, but twice!

the first pass occurs between 6:00pm, from the South West West horizon, and reaches it's highest angular elevation of 20 degress, with respect to the horizon to the South at approx. 6:06pm. it will dip below the South Eastern horizon at 6:12pm.

the second pass (much darker and easier to see, but also lower in the sky) will occur at 7:42pm, again rising from the South West West horizon, reaching a maximum angular elevation of 12 degrees, with respect to the horizon to the South at approx. 7:48pm. it will dip below the South Eastern horizon at approximately 7:52pm.

to get a good view, you will need a good southerly horizon, unobstructed by buildings if you are at ground level. if this is impossible, then try and get up somewhere highto improve your chances.

bundle up with all your cold weather gear. it will be cold outside. amateur astronomy in winter is no joke!

i will be up on my roof deck, fully kitted out, looking like i'm off on a polar expedition somewhere, but hopefully i won't get cold, and i stand a very good chance of seeing the hubble space telescope with nothing more than my eyes and a pair of binoculars. i should get to see venus and mercury, too (no extra charge...)

should be a good test of my winter weather gear...

Wednesday, February 07, 2007

want to see the planets venus and mercury just after sunset?





















from sky & telescope magazine:

Catch the solar system's two inner planets at once; this week elusive Mercury is lower right of Venus in twilight. They're much more different in brightness than indicated here. Look too early and Mercury will be invisible; look too late and it will have set!

(The blue 10° scale is about the size of your fist at arm's length.)
Sky & Telescope diagram.

moto gp season only a month away...



yes, ted haggard is 'completely heterosexual'.

if only he'd been to a few bike races...

Tuesday, February 06, 2007

Ted Haggard Pronounced ‘Completely Heterosexual’



from the new york times:

Haggard also said his sexual contact with men was limited to the former male prostitute who came forward with sexual allegations...

yeah, i'd say that makes you completely hetrosexual...

what to see from a 5th floor apartment window..



while light pollution kills most faint deep sky objects in the middle of washington, d.c., there's still a few great sights that anyone can see with nothing more expensive than a pair of binoculars. in fact a telescope won't allow you to see big open clusters as well as binoculars because of their smaller field of view. there are many misconceptions about amateur astronomy, and needing a 'powerful' telescope always comes in at number 1.

take this open star cluster in the constellation taurus, for example.

it's called the hyades, and is the nearest open star cluster to us at a distance of only 150 light years - 900 trillion miles...

space is a vast empty place. but very pretty in a few places.

Sunday, February 04, 2007

wales vs ireland



this should be a great game.

ireland look very good right now and i'm giving it to ireland.

Saturday, February 03, 2007

smile if you're happy...



as exxon and shell execs and shareholders enjoy shamefully record profits at the expense of the planet, did you know that your nation's leader is about to
ask lawmakers to cut more than $70 billion from medicare and medicaid in the next five years?

yep. this is the white house's great idea on how best to balance the budget by 2012.

and good news in the united states'position with regard to climate change..(no, not really)

from the new york times:


The Bush administration, which until recently avoided directly accepting that humans were warming the planet in potentially harmful ways, embraced the findings, which had been approved by representatives from the United States and 112 other countries on Thursday night.

Administration officials asserted Friday that the United States had played a leading role in studying and combating climate change, (what, by refusing to sign the kyoto protocol, or adopt any enforced reductions in emissions, you mean?) in part by an investment of an average of almost $5 billion a year for the past six years in research and tax incentives for new technologies. (that's really working out so well for the planet, isn't it?)

At the same time, Secretary of Energy Samuel Bodman rejected the idea of unilateral limits on emissions. (to do so would be ridiculous...) “We are a small contributor to the overall,(we're the world's largest polluter) when you look at the rest of the world, so it’s really got to be a global solution,” he said. (i really would like just to punch his lights out)

The United States, with about 5 percent of the world’s population, contributes about a quarter of greenhouse gas emissions, more than any other country.(doesn't that completely contradict what the secretary of energy said? - see above comment)

we have a saying back home that so aptly applies to this psychotic:

"i wouldn't cross the road to piss on him if he were on fire"

england vs. scotland.







england vs. scotland

come on england!

i have live bbc tv coverage! that means no adverts, no dancing in the end zone, no stopping the play every 20 seconds, no adverts for pick-up trucks!!!!, NO ADVERTS AT ALL, IN FACT!!!, no prima donna 'stars', no kevlar body armour, players helping each other up after hard tackles, no trash-talking, and finally, no media talk about how hard it's been for this player or that player, blah, blah, blah, and finally, the commentator's have no idea how much money anyone is making...

in your face the NFL!

nutty's pick to win the tournament:

either ireland or france.

definitely not england...! we are a shambles... :(

it will be very difficult for italy not to finish last.

italy vs. france



nutty's prediction: france.

they are just too fast and strong for italy, but it could be entertaining in the first half. i'm going to listen to it on the radio.

six nations rugby!






alright; first we have:

Saturday, 3 February
Stadio Flaminio, Rome

Italy v France (Sat)

Kick-off: 1330 GMT
Live - BBC One, BBC Sport website. Updates - Five Live

Italy host defending champions France in the opening match of the 2007 RBS Six Nations in Rome on Saturday.

The Azzurri finished bottom of the table last year after four defeats and an 18-18 draw against Wales.

The hosts have claimed the Wooden Spoon five times in seven tournaments but led France at half-time in 2006 before running out of steam in a 37-12 defeat.

France, who won the title on points from Ireland, will be desperate to impress in World Cup year on home soil.

But France, who have won the Five/Six Nations title 15 times, lost twice to the All Blacks and scraped to a 27-26 win over Argentina in the autumn. (yes, but the all-blacks have played some of the best rugby in the world this past year, and must be highly tipped to lift the world cup…)

followed by:

Saturday, 3 February

England v Scotland (Sat)

Twickenham, London
Kick-off: 1600 GMT
Live on BBC One, Five Live, BBC Sport website

England are looking to launch a successful new era under coach Brian Ashton when they host auld enemy Scotland at Twickenham on Saturday.

The world champions (that’s us, believe it or not…) are desperate to bounce back after losing eight (eight!) of their last nine Tests under Andy Robinson.

Scotland are on the up after coming third in last year's Six Nations with wins over England, France and Italy.

Friday, February 02, 2007

team nutty now in the world's top 7,000 teams




nutty is a little 'surprised' that none of the mates have joined team nutty...

how much longer must he and daisy tread alone?

Thursday, February 01, 2007

Exxon Sets Record on Annual Profits



hundreds of climate scientists and government officials from around the world have worked all week behind closed doors and frequently darkened windows in a united nations building in paris to summarize the factors behind global warming in a report to be released friday.

so how exactly is the collective world going to tackle the issue of global warming? you can have all the meetings you like, but someone’s actually got to do something, and soon.

here’s a crazy idea: one that can’t possibly work, of course… why not implement a special climate-change 5% tax on the net profits of all companies whose business is the extraction of fossil fuels? i’m speaking primarily of the coal, oil and gas industries.

i propose this as exxon reports a $39.5 billion annual profit, the largest annual profit ever for an american company, and yet surely, is anyone left in any doubt now, that the continued burning of fossil fuels directly affects all peoples living on this planet, and fragile ecosystems alike. the overwhelming scientific consensus agrees that the world’s largest consumer of energy (1/20th of the world’s population consumes ¼ of the world’s energy) cannot go on ignoring the mounting evidence that it is now a global problem.

exxon’s absolutely staggering profits (let me just explain how much money that really is: $39,500,000,000) – that’s $108 million dollars a day profit! , along with those of the rest of the oil and gas industry, will be enjoyed only by their respective executives and shareholders. the by-product of what they sell can now be demonstrated to be directly contributing to global warming. these companies and their shareholders are getting rich at the expense of everyone else. doesn’t this seem completely wrong?

they can all very easily afford to pay a 5% tax on their net profits. i think that leaves them with with 95% profit, doesn't it?...so they’re not going out of business, but look at the massive capital investment that alternative energy research projects would receive if this were to become reality.

undeniably, they can afford to pay. these corporations don’t own the planet, and yet why does it seem they do?...

anyone remember the exxon valdez oil spill? some ten years later:

‘To the naked eye, Prince William Sound may appear “normal.” But if you look beneath the surface, oil continues to contaminate beaches, national parks, and designated wilderness. In fact, the Office of Technology Assessment estimated beach cleanup and oil skinning only recovered 3-4% of the Exxon Valdez oil and studies by government scientists estimated that only 14% of the oil was removed during cleanup operations.

A decade later, the ecosystem still suffers. Substantial contamination of mussel beds persists and this remarkably unweathered oil is a continuing source of toxic hydrocarbons. Sea otters, river otters, Barrow’s goldeneyes, and harlequin ducks have showed evidence of continued hydrocarbon exposure in the past few years.
The depressed population of Pacific herring – a critical source of food for over 40 predators including seabirds, harbor seals and Steller sea lions – is having severe impacts up the food chain. Wildlife population declines continue for harbor seal, killer whales, harlequin ducks, common loon, pigeon guillemot, and pelagic, red-faced cormorant, and double-crested cormorants.


it’s everyone’s planet, not the oil and gas companies. i say if they want to get super rich digging it up, extracting fossil fuels buried deep beneath the surface so we can all burn it, well then let them, and make them pay for the consequences of their actions. in doing so, alternative energies receive massive capital investment, thereby driving new technologies. not only that, but the oil and gas companies themselves will be quick to jump on the bandwagon once they see a marketable product/technology that they can sell to industry. they still want want to make a lot of money out of selling energy, long after the fossil fuels have run out...

and after we’ve started with the ones that sell it, i say we quickly slap a progressive climate tax on the fossil fuels themselves. after all, we're the ones burning them, releasing all the CO2 into the atmosphere because we actually rather like having power for our homes, our cars, our computers, our big flat screen tv's, our sound systems, and our x-box's...that way, everyone is forced to change their individual usage habits, and let's be honest, people just don't change their habits unless they have a strong incentive to do so, or they have to. so you just have make them, and changing everyone's habits (yes, you ridiculous-looking escalade xlt & hummer owners) is exactly what it’s going to take to stop all the geography maps from having to be redrawn because there's now a lot more water, and a lot less land to look at (sorry polar bears...)

and the united states of america has an opportunity to step up and actually do something really good for a change, instead of kicking sand in the world's face, refusing to sign the kyoto treaty, silently proclaiming that their economy is the most important thing on the planet, wanting everyone else to put their house in order first, and not look like the arrogant, spoilt, uncaring bastard it does right now.

because otherwise, it's all just a load of hot air...

a lunar halo visible over dc tonight



12:30am: daisy just texted me from pennsylvania to tell me there's a halo around the moon. it looks a lot better there than it does in d.c....

this is actually a fairly common sight and is caused by high, thin, cirrus (read hazy) clouds containing millions of tiny ice crystals scattering the moonlight. each ice crystal acts like a miniature lens.

we see a halo because most of the crystals have a similar elongated hexagonal shape, and the light entering one crystal face and exiting through the opposing face refracts 22 degrees, which corresponds to the radius of the moon halo. luckily, it looks a lot prettier than it sounds...

so, to produce a lunar halo, you must have:

* moonlight, and
* a thin veil of hexagonal ice crystals between our eyes and the moon.

this is very similar to sunlight and rain falling between our eyes and the sun to produce a rainbow.

we also sometimes see a similar sun halo visible during the day.

so now you know!